Archetypes of the spiritual movement in Russian historiosophy

Authors

  • Татьяна Евгеньевна Сорокина Sorokina Tatyana Evgenievna – Ph. D. of linguistics, professor. Journalism dpt. Moscow State University of Art and Culture.

Abstract

Sorokina Tatyana Evgenievna

The article considers the main principles of Russian philosophy of history. The most discussed historiosophical idea, going through a variety of transformations, remains Slavyanofil doctrine of special destiny of Russia, its spiritual integrity. The author focuses on the fact that preserving «national archetype» as a key issue, Russian historiosophy offered various options related to the West as a symbol of a different worldview. Mindful of the global fascination with Buddhist understanding of human destiny and history of the world, it must be said that the Russian historiosophy presumed itself in opposition to the Buddhist concept of the historiosophical. Briefly it is explained the reasons for the occurrence of classical Russian literature historiosophical space. 1. The national literature was perceived by Russian thinkers as the «second history». 2. Figures of historical discourse were five Russian classics: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy. 3. The fate and the works of Russian writers of the inherent rationale of national historical path in its different variants. 4. The Russian philosophy of history, to show interest in religious issues, examines the life and work of every writer as a definite spiritual model of public importance and is being implemented in the historical world. It is commented on historico-philosophical concept of Leontiev and Fedorov, Rozanov and Solovyov who emphasize that eschatology is the semantic core of Russian philosophy of history. 

Key words: Russian historical philosophy, national archetype, historiosophical concept, Slavophile doctrine, Buddhism, eschatology.

Author Biography

Татьяна Евгеньевна Сорокина, Sorokina Tatyana Evgenievna – Ph. D. of linguistics, professor. Journalism dpt. Moscow State University of Art and Culture.

Sorokina Tatyana Evgenievna – Ph. D. of linguistics, professor.
Journalism dpt. Moscow State University of Art and Culture. Moscow,
Russian Federation. Phone: +7 926-375-08-32; e-mail: tasor74@yandex.ru

References

Бердяев Н.А. Русская идея. Основные проблемы русской мысли XIX века и начала XX века // О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.

Булгаков С.Н. Воскресение Христа и современное сознание // Русские философы (конец XIX - середина XX века): антология. Вып. 1. М., 1993.

Зеньковский В.В. История русской философии. Введение //О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.

Розанов В.В. Эстетическое понимание истории // Русские философы (конец XIX-середина XX века): антология. Вып. 2. М., 1994.

Федотов Г.П. Национальное и вселенское // О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.

Флоровский Г. Пути русского богословия. Киев, 1991.

References

Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya. Osnovnye problemy russkoi mysli XIX veka i nachala XX veka // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.

Bulgakov S.N. Voskresenie Khrista i sovremennoe soznanie // Russkie filosofy (konets XIX - seredina XX veka): Antologiya. Vyp. 1. M., 1993.

Fedotov G.P. Natsional’noe i vselenskoe // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.

Florovskii G. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Kiev, 1991.

Rozanov V.V. Esteticheskoe ponimanie istorii // Russkie filosofy (konets XIX- seredina XX veka): Antologiya. Vyp. 2. M., 1994.

Zen’kovskii V.V. Istoriya russkoi filosofii. Vvedenie // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.

Published

2016-03-24

How to Cite

Сорокина, Т. Е. (2016). Archetypes of the spiritual movement in Russian historiosophy. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (1), 12–19. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/10.18522%252F1995-0640-2016-1-12-19

Issue

Section

LITERATURE STUDY