Archetypes of the spiritual movement in Russian historiosophy
Abstract
Sorokina Tatyana Evgenievna
The article considers the main principles of Russian philosophy of history. The most discussed historiosophical idea, going through a variety of transformations, remains Slavyanofil doctrine of special destiny of Russia, its spiritual integrity. The author focuses on the fact that preserving «national archetype» as a key issue, Russian historiosophy offered various options related to the West as a symbol of a different worldview. Mindful of the global fascination with Buddhist understanding of human destiny and history of the world, it must be said that the Russian historiosophy presumed itself in opposition to the Buddhist concept of the historiosophical. Briefly it is explained the reasons for the occurrence of classical Russian literature historiosophical space. 1. The national literature was perceived by Russian thinkers as the «second history». 2. Figures of historical discourse were five Russian classics: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy. 3. The fate and the works of Russian writers of the inherent rationale of national historical path in its different variants. 4. The Russian philosophy of history, to show interest in religious issues, examines the life and work of every writer as a definite spiritual model of public importance and is being implemented in the historical world. It is commented on historico-philosophical concept of Leontiev and Fedorov, Rozanov and Solovyov who emphasize that eschatology is the semantic core of Russian philosophy of history.
Key words: Russian historical philosophy, national archetype, historiosophical concept, Slavophile doctrine, Buddhism, eschatology.
References
Бердяев Н.А. Русская идея. Основные проблемы русской мысли XIX века и начала XX века // О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.
Булгаков С.Н. Воскресение Христа и современное сознание // Русские философы (конец XIX - середина XX века): антология. Вып. 1. М., 1993.
Зеньковский В.В. История русской философии. Введение //О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.
Розанов В.В. Эстетическое понимание истории // Русские философы (конец XIX-середина XX века): антология. Вып. 2. М., 1994.
Федотов Г.П. Национальное и вселенское // О России и русской философской культуре. Философы русского послеоктябрьского зарубежья. М., 1990.
Флоровский Г. Пути русского богословия. Киев, 1991.
References
Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya. Osnovnye problemy russkoi mysli XIX veka i nachala XX veka // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.
Bulgakov S.N. Voskresenie Khrista i sovremennoe soznanie // Russkie filosofy (konets XIX - seredina XX veka): Antologiya. Vyp. 1. M., 1993.
Fedotov G.P. Natsional’noe i vselenskoe // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.
Florovskii G. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Kiev, 1991.
Rozanov V.V. Esteticheskoe ponimanie istorii // Russkie filosofy (konets XIX- seredina XX veka): Antologiya. Vyp. 2. M., 1994.
Zen’kovskii V.V. Istoriya russkoi filosofii. Vvedenie // O Rossii i russkoi filosofskoi kul’ture. Filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr’skogo zarubezh’ya. M., 1990.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).