Deixis mitigation strategies
Abstract
Olga Gennadievna Melnik, Mary Yurievna Nechepurenko, Evgeny Vladislavovich Krasnoschekov
The article analyses the deictic mitigation as a special type of mitigation devices directed at distancing the speaker from the content of the utterance. In most cases, the point of reference coincides with the speaker.
It is well known that the main types of deixis are person, place and time. It was found out that the deixis of place does not play a significant role in the expression of the mitigation strategy. The research has revealed that reference to both the time and the person coordinates of the deictic center plays an important part in the development of mitigating strategies.
The main distancing strategy with the help of the time deixis is the usage of conditional forms of verbs.
In addition to mitigating strategy underlying deictic shift along the temporal coordinate the speakers could use metaphoric shift along the coordinates of the speech act. It was proved that the deletion of the speech act participants’ identity (the indefinite pronoun one, the agentless passive construction, and the pseudo-inclusive pronoun we.) one can get the mitigating effect. The partial deictic shift from the speaker’s coordinate towards the listener brings about a particular perlocutionary effect: it diminishes the speaker’s role.
The authors come to a conclusion about the necessity of highlighting the mitigating function of deixis, which is a kind of Deixis ad Phantasma but not as the secondary, narrative deixis but as the primary dialogue deixis referring to the information implied in the utterance.
Key words: deixis, deictic shift, reference, mitigation.
References
Тахтарова С.С. Пропозициональное смягчения и языковые средства его реализации // Вестн. Волгогр. гос. ун-та. Серия 2. Языкознание. 2009. № 1 (9).
Шаховский В.И. Лингвистическая теория эмоций. М.: Гнозис, 2008.
Caffi C. Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2007.
Fraser B. Conversational mitigation // Journal of Pragmatics 1980. № 4.
Haverkate H. Deictic categories as mitigating device // Pragmatics. 1992. Vol. 2, № 4.
Jespersen O. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen-Unwin, 1955.
Rauh, G. Aspects of deixis. In: G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tubingen: Narr, 1983.
References
Takhtarova S.S. Propozitsional’noe smyagcheniya i yazykovye sredstva ego realizatsii. Volgograd: Vestnik Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie. 2009. № 1 (9). S. 166-169.
Shakhovskii VI. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsii. M.: Gnozis, 2008. 416 s.
Caffi C. “Mitigation”. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007. 342 p.
Fraser, B. “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 1980. №4: Р. 341-350.
Haverkate H. “Deictic categories as mitigating device”. Pragmatics, 1992. 2,4. P. 505-522.
Jespersen O. “The philosophy of grammar”. London: Allen-Unwin. 1955.
Rauh G. “Aspects of deixis”. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tubingen: Narr, 1983. Р. 9-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).