Linguacultural space “Man-Nature” in literary texts: cognitive and pragmatic approach
Abstract
Eldarova Ruzanna Alievna – post-graduate student of common linguistics dpt. Adygea State University.
Abstract. The magnitude of representation of nature images, the links to the author’s mind, the hero, the reader can be considered in literary texts as one of the most important sources for identifying the parameters of the national picture of the world and the individually author’s transformation of its components. Researches that identify patterns of functioning linguacultural spaces in the texts are able to give new results projected in the linguistic picture of the ethnic group of the world due to reflections in literary texts of archetypal, stereotyped images of peculiar linguistic culture and ethnic group as a whole as well as individually-copyright, which characterize a particular linguistic identity and its conception of the world. Cognitive paradigm of modern linguistics, anthropocentric in nature allows to consider culture as a process modeling language, which naturally highlights the problem of linguistic linguaculture of predetermined value. Great importance in this regard is the concept of space as linguocultural cognitive model of objective reality. Cognitive-pragmatic potential of a literary text is deepening due to the introduction the descriptions of nature, since they always implement the ethical, aesthetic, and intellectual abilities of the creative subject.
Key words: anthropomorphism, linguacultural space, cognitive model, semiosis culture, cognitive-pragmatic aspect.
References
Алефиренко Н.Ф. Язык - сознание - культура: проблемы взаимодействия // Язык и культура: докл. Третьей междунар. конф. «Язык и культура». Вып. 3. Киев, 1994.
Гачев Г.Д. Национальные образы мира. М.: Academia, 1998.
Дуров А.А. Методологические проблемы интерпретации эстетического субъекта в художественной прозе // Принципы и методы исследования в филологии : конец ХХ века. СПб.; Ставрополь, 2001. Вып. 6.
Кешоков А. Стихотворения и поэмы. М.: Гослитиздат, 1957.
Кобозева И.М. Семантические проблемы анализа политической метафоры // Вестн. Моск. гос. ун-та. Серия 9. 2001. № 6.
Кудакова Е.Е. Интерсубъективность и диалог: Опыт экзистенциальнофеноменологической характеристики отношения Я - Другой: автореф. дис. ... канд. филос. наук. Ростов н/Д., 2002.
Кумпилов К. Миг вечности. Майкоп: Адыг. отд. Краснодарского кн. изд-ва. 1978.
Майстренко В.И. Социально-философский анализ воспитания как культурного феномена: автореф. дис. ... канд. филос. наук. Ростов н/Д., 2009.
Мамардашвили М. Картезианские размышления. М.: Изд. группа «Прогресс»; «Культура», 1993.
Мокиенко В.М. В глубь поговорки: книга для учащихся. Киев: Радянська школа, 1989.
Пропп В.Я. Русская сказка: собр. тр. М.: Лабиринт, 2000.
Фрейд З. Будущее одной иллюзии // Сумерки богов / сост. и общ. ред. А.А. Яковлева: пер. с нем. М.: Политиздат, 1990.
Фрейденберг О.М. Поэтика сюжета и жанра. М.: Наука, 1997.
Шогенцуков А. Избранное. Нальчик: Эльбрус, 1975.
References
Alefirenko N.F. Yazyk - soznanie - kul’tura: problemy vzaimodeistviya // Yazyk i kul’tura: dokl. Tret’ei mezhdunar. konf. «Yazyk i kul’tura». Vyp. 3. Kiev, 1994. S. Z-9.
Gachev G.D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira. M.: Academia, 1998. 430 s.
Durov A.A. Metodologicheskie problemy interpretatsii esteticheskogo sub»ekta v khudozhestvennoi proze // Printsipy i metody issledovaniya v filologii : konets KhKh veka. SPb.; Stavropol’, 2001. Vyp. 6. S.131-137.
Keshokov A. Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. M.: Goslitizdat, 1957. 232 s.
Kobozeva I.M. Semanticheskie problemy analiza politicheskoi metafory // Vestnik MGU. Seriya 9. 2001. № 6. S. 132-149.
Kudakova E.E. Intersub'ektivnost’ i dialog: Opyt ekzistentsial’no-
fenomenologicheskoi kharakteristiki otnosheniya Ya-Drugoi: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filosof. nauk. Rostov n/D., 2002. 24 s.
Kumpilov K. Mig vechnosti. Maikop: Adyg. otd. Krasnodar. kn. izd-va. 157 s.
Maistrenko V.I. Sotsial’no-filosofskii analiz vospitaniya kak kul’turnogo fenomena: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filosof. nauk. Rostov n/D., 2009. 24 s.
Mamardashvili M. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. M.: Izd. gruppa «Progress»; «Kul’tura», 1993. 352 s.
Mokienko V.M. V glub’ pogovorki: kniga dlya uchashchihsya. Kiev: Radyanska shkola, 1989. 220 s.
Propp V.Ya. Sobr. trudov. Russkaya skazka. M.: Labirint, 2000. 416 s.
Freid S. Budushchee odnoi illyuzii // Sumerki bogov /sost. i obshch. red. A.A. Yakovleva: Perevod. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 94-142.
Freidenberg O.M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M.: Nauka, 1997. 298 s.
Shogentsukov A. Izbrannoe. Nal’chik: El’brus, 1975. 355s.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
