Metalanguage, its properties and role in the language system

Authors

  • Дарья Игоревна Остапенко Ostapenko D.I. (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Ostapenko Darya Igorevna – PhD in Philology, Lecturer at the Department of the Theory of Translation and Intercultural Communication, the Faculty of Romance and Germanic Philology, Voronezh State University.

The article is devoted to the study of the notion «metalanguage» in modern linguistics. The author analyses approaches to the definition of metalanguage, the place it occupies in the language system, its properties, types, components, and usage. At the beginning of the article the author defines the notion «metalanguage» in the framework of the semiotic approach, specifies who was the first to use the term «metalanguage», and makes reference to the way this phenomenon is interpreted in philosophy. Then the author proceeds to the study of the notion «metalanguage» from the linguistic point of view and starts with a thorough investigation of Roman Jakobson’s opinion on the matter since he was among the first linguists to draw attention to it. The article deals with two main approaches to the place which metalanguage occupies in the language system: according to the first approach, metalanguage is defined as an artificial language; according to the second approach, metalanguage is considered as the part of the natural language. The author also points out key differences between metalanguage and terminology and enumerates the reasons why communicators might want to use metalinguistic elements. Besides, the article describes various types of metalanguage, e.g. everyday metalanguage, linguistic metalanguage, and metametalanguage, the suggested classifications being based on different parameters. Finally, the author analyses possible situations when metalanguage can be used paying specific attention to the metalinguistic features of translation and interpreting. The author comes to the conclusion that in this case it would be right to talk about a metacommunicative function rather than about a metalinguistic one.

Key words: metalanguage, metalinguistic function, metacommunicative function, translation and interpreting, everyday metalanguage, linguistic metalanguage, metametalanguage.

References

Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. М., 2004.

Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. М., 1994.

Вежбицка А. Понимание культур через посредство ключевых слов. М., 2001.

Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. М., 1990.

Дуфва Х., Ляхтеэнмяки М., Кашкин В.Б. Метаязыковой компонент языкового сознания // Языковое сознание: содержание и функционирование: XIII Междунар. симп. по психолингвистике и теории коммуникации. М., 2000.

Жуков В.Г. Немецкая разговорная речь. М., 1983.

Кашкин В.Б. Бытовая философия языка и языковые контрасты // Теоретическая и прикладная лингвистика. Вып. 3: Аспекты метакоммуникативной деятельности. Воронеж, 2002.

Куликова И.С., Салмина Д.В. Введение в металингвистику (системный, лексикографический и коммуникативно-прагматический аспекты лингвистической терминологии). СПб., 2002.

Остапенко Д.И. Переводческий метатекст: типология, структура и функции. М., 2015.

Философская энциклопедия // Академик [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/708/ (дата обращения: 14.06.2016).

Якобсон Р. Избранные работы. М., 1985.

Якобсон Р. Лингвистика и поэтика // Структурализм: «за» и «против». М., 1975.

Carnap R. Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, 1988.

Frey G. Sprache, Ausdruck des Bewußtseins. Stuttgart, 1965.

Jaworski A., Coupland N., Galasiński D. Metalanguage: why now? // Metalanguage. Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin, 2004.

Matthews P.H. Linguistics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, 2003.

Verschueren J. Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use // Metalanguage. Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin, 2004.

References

Akhmanova O.S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov. M., 2004. 571 s.

Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. M., 1994. 616 s.

Vezhbitska A. Ponimanie kul’tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevykh slov. M., 2001. 288 s.

Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. M., 1990. 688 s.

Dufva Kh., Lyakhteenmyaki M., Kashkin V.B. Metayazykovoi komponent yazykovogo soznaniya // Yazykovoe soznanie: soderzhanie i funktsionirovanie. XIII Mezhdunar. simp. po psikholingvistike i teorii kommunikatsii. M., 2000. S. 81-82.

Zhukov V.G. Nemetskaya razgovornaya rech’. M., 1983. 73 s.

Kashkin V.B. Bytovaya filosofiya yazyka i yazykovye kontrasty // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya lingvistika. Vyp. 3: Aspekty metakommunikativnoi deyatel’nosti. Voronezh, 2002. S. 4-34.

Kulikova I.S., Salmina D.V. Vvedenie v metalingvistiku (sistemnyi, leksikograficheskii i kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekty lingvisticheskoi terminologii). SPb., 2002. 352 s.

Ostapenko D.I. Perevodcheskii metatekst: tipologiya, struktura i funktsii. M., 2015. 228 s.

Filosofskaya entsiklopediya // Akademik [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http:// dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/708/ (data obrashcheniya: 14 iyunya 2016).

Yakobson R. Izbrannye raboty. M., 1985. 455 s.

Yakobson R. Lingvistika i poetika // Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv». M., 1975. S. 193-230.

Carnap R. Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, 1988. 266 p.

Frey G. Sprache, Ausdruck des Bewußtseins. Stuttgart, 1965. 148 S.

Jaworski A., Coupland N., Galasiński D. Metalanguage: why now? // Metalanguage. Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin, 2004. pp. 3-10.

Matthews P.H. Linguistics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, 2003. 132 p.

Verschueren J. Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use // Metalanguage. Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin, 2004. pp. 53-74.

How to Cite

Остапенко, Д. И. (2016). Metalanguage, its properties and role in the language system. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (3), 120–126. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/10.18522%252F1995-0640-2016-3-120-126

Issue

Section

LINGUISTICS