Special Distribution of Discourse Markers Determined by Genre-Specific Scientific Discourse
Abstract
Olesya A. Zagorodnova (Yaroslavl, Russian Federation)
The article is concerned with the role of discourse markers in denoting the genre of some text or utterance. The analysis is based on proper scientific discourse, including such genres as a monograph, article, lecture and discussion. In this case, discourse markers are defined as linguistic and nonverbal elements that signal relations between units of talk by virtue of their syntactic and semantic properties. Regarding the mentioned typology of discourse markers and classifying features of the above mentioned scientific genres, the author studies some fragments taken from English and Russian monographs, articles, lectures and discussions. The analysis of discourse markers and their functional characteristics within scientific philological texts and presentations shows that these language units indicate genrerelated structures in scientific communication and fulfill their key functions. The author concludes that discourse markers serve as indicators of the above referenced scientific genres, and encourage these results to be adopted into the existing education programs on stylistics and oral communication.
Key words: scientific discourse, genre-specific discourse, discourse markers, typology of discourse markers, scientific monograph, scientific article, scientific lecture, scientific discussion.
DOI 10.23683/1995-0640-2017-4-72-79
Quote:
Zagorodnova, O. A. (2017). Special Distribution of Discourse Markers Determined by Genre-Specific Scientific Discourse. Proceedings of Southern federal university. Philology. 4, 72‒79.
References
Вишневская Г.М., Загороднова О.А. Метаязыковые свойства дискурсивных маркеров в различных стилях речи // Верхневолжский филол. вестн. 2015. № 2.(2). С. 65 – 69.
Кожина М.Н. О речевой системности научного стиля сравнительно с некоторыми другими. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. ун-та, 1972. 395 с.
Матвеева Т.В. Функциональные стили в аспекте текстовых категорий. Свердловск: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 1990. 172 с.
Петров Д. Ю., Борейко В. Н. Магия слова. Диалог о языке и языках. М.: ПрозаиК, 2010. 208 с.
Тер-Минасова С.Г. Война и мир языков и культур. М., 2008. 344 c.
Тортунова И.А. Современная российская бизнес-пресса как разновидность деловой коммуникации // Верхневолжский филол. вестн. 2015. № 2. С. 112 – 117.
Эпштейн М. От гуманитарных наук к гуманитарным технологиям (2010) // URL: https://tvkultura.ru/video/show/brand_id/20898/episode_id/ 156593 (дата обращения: 23.03.2017).
Coxhead A., Byrd P. Preparing Writing Teachers to Teach the Vocabulary and Grammar of Academic Prose // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2007. № 16. Pр. 129 – 147.
Crystal D. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 212 p.
Elman J. Grey Matters: Understanding Language (July 2006) // URL: https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1pbnWcabMY (дата обращения 08.01.2016).
Ene D. The Correlation between Language and Cultural Identity in Phraseological Units // Buletin Stiintific. 2013. Vol. 22, № 2. Pр. 109 – 116.
Fraser B. Pragmatic markers // Pragmatics. 1996. № 6. Pр. 167 – 190.
Henkemans A. Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation // Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 2014. № 36 (49). Pр. 41 – 58.
Linguist Forum (2013). URL: http://linguistforum.com (дата обращения 30.08.2015).
Schiffrin D. Discourse markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 364 p.
University of Oxford Podcasts (2014). URL: https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk (дата обращения: 30.08.2015).
References
Vishnevskaya G.M., Zagorodnova O.A. Metayazykovyye svoystva diskursivnykh markerov v razlichnykh stilyakh rechi, Verkhnevolzhskiy philologicheskiy vestnik, 2015, no 2 (2), pp. 65-69. (In Russian).
Kozhina M.N. O rechevoy sistemnosti nauchnogo stilya sravnitelno s nekotorymi drugimi. Perm: PermU Publ., 1972. 395 p. (In Russian)
Matveeva T.V. Funktsionalnyye stili v aspekte tekstovykh kategoriy. Sverdlovsk: Ural U. Publ., 1990. 172 p. (In Russian).
Petrov D.Yu., Boreiko V.N. Magia slova. Dialog o yazuke i yazukakh. M.: ProzaiK, 2010. 208 p. (In Russian).
Ter-Minasova S.G. Voina i mir yazukov i kultur. M., 2008. 344 p. (In Russian).
Tortunova I.A. Sovremennaya biznes-pressa kak raznovidnostˊ delovoy kommunikazii, Verhnevolzhskiy philologicheskiy vestnik, 2015, no 2 (2), pp. 112-117. (In Russian).
Epstein M. Ot gumanitarnukh nauk k gumanitarnym tekhnologiyam (2010) // URL: https://tvkultura.ru/video/show/brand_id/20898/episode_id/ 156593 (accessed date: 23.03.2017). (In Russian).
Coxhead A., Byrd P. Preparing Writing Teachers to Teach the Vocabulary and Grammar of Academic Prose, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2007, no 16, pp. 129-147.
Crystal D. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 212 pp.
Elman J. Grey Matters: Understanding Language (July 2006). URL: https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1pbnWcabMY (accessed 08.01.2016).
Ene D. The Correlation between Language and Cultural Identity in Phraseological Units. Buletin Stiintific. 2013, vol. 22, no 2, pp. 109-116.
Fraser B. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics. 1996, no 6. pp. 167-190.
Henkemans A. Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2014, no 36 (49), pp. 41-58.
Linguist Forum (2013). URL: http://linguistforum.com (accessed 30.08.2015).
Schiffrin D. Discourse markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 364 p.
University of Oxford Podcasts (2014). URL: https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk (accessed date: 30.08.2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).