Narration Features in the Novel “The Lover” by M. Duras

Authors

  • Наталья Сергеевна Шуринова Южный федеральный университет

Abstract

Natalya S. Shurinova (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)

The article researches the alternation of the types of narrative from the first and third person in the autobiographical novel “The Lover” by M.Duras. Taking into account various effects associated with the author’s refusal of the autobiographical text from using the pronoun “I” in relation to himself, we demonstrate various semantic nuances of the novel by M. Duras. The study shows that the narration in the third person is connected with the visual reconstruction of the author’s portrait. In addition, it is a means of psychological exclusion. The author avoids direct self-identification with the character of the novel at the time of describing the key experiences, this accentuates the contradictory feelings, testifies to the unknowability of the past “I” and the impossibility of reconstructing personal history. In addition, the distance established by refusing the pronoun “I” makes selfknowledge dialogical: the author shows points of view reflecting her own image. The simultaneous use in the novel of the pronouns “je” and “elle” creates in the text a contradiction, pushing the boundaries of the “I”. The personal experience of the author turns out to be correlated with the experience of “other”, including the potential reader of the text.

Key words: Duras, “The Lover”, autofication, narrative strategy, selfportrait, trauma, multiple “I”.

DOI 10.23683/1995-0640-2018-1-31-37

Author Biography

Наталья Сергеевна Шуринова, Южный федеральный университет

Natalya S. Shurinova – Master of Philology. Theory and History of World Literature dpt. Institute of philology, journalism and cross-cultural communication. Southern Federal University.

References

Бланшо М. Неописуемое сообщество. М.: Московский философский фонд (МФФ), 1998. 78 с.

Дюрас М. Любовник // Дюрас М. Любовник. Летний вечер, половина одиннадцатого. Модерато кантабиле / пер. с фр. О. Захаровой. М.: Флюид Фрилай, 2007. С. 5–111.

Armel A. Marguerite Duras et l’autobiographie. Paris: Le Castor Astral, 1990. 172 p.

Bouthors-Paillar, C. Duras la métisse: métissage fantasmatique et linguistique dans l’oeuvre de Marguerite Duras. Genève: Librairie Droz, 2002. 248 p.

Denès D. Etude sur Marguerite Duras, L’Amant. Paris: Ellipses, 1997. 96 p.́

Iser W. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1994. 358 p.

Lejeune Ph. Je est un autre: l’autobiographie, de la littérature aux médias. Paris: Seuil, 1980. 333 p.

Lejeune Ph. Le pacte autobiographique. Paris: Seuil, 1975. 381 p.

McGill R. The treacherous imagination: intimacy, ethics and autobiographical fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2013. 208 p.

Miralaei А. A. S., Shokrian M. J. Le Je(u) autobiographique à travers la trilogie familiale de Duras // Recherches en langue et littérature françaises. Vol. 52, № 213. 2009. P. 67–80.

Soler Pérez A. «L’Amant» de Marguerite Duras ou l’image d’un univers aliénant // Estudios de lengua y literatura francesas. № 6. 1992. P. 107–128.

Van de Biezenbos L. Fantasmes maternelles dans l’oeuvre de Marguerite Duras: dialogue entre Duras et Freud. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. 214 p.

Viollet C. Autobiographie et disparition du «je»: Kindheitsmuster de Christa Wolf // Leçons d’écriture, ce que disent les manuscrits. Paris, Minard, 1985. P. 195– 206.

References

Blansho M. Neopisuyemoye soobshchestvo. M.: Moskovskiy filosofskiy fond (MFF), 1998. 78 p. (In Russian).

Dyuras M. Lyubovnik. M. Dyuras. Lyubovnik. Letniy vecher, polovina odinnadtsatogo. Moderato kantabile; per. s fr. O. Zakharovoy. M.: Flyuid Frilai, 2007. P. 5–111. (In Russian).

Armel A. Marguerite Duras et l’autobiographie. Paris: Le Castor Astral, 1990. 172 p.

Bouthors-Paillar, C. Duras la métisse: métissage fantasmatique et linguistique dans l’oeuvre de Marguerite Duras. Genève: Librairie Droz, 2002. 248 p.

Denès D. Etude sur Marguerite Duras, L’Amant. Paris: Ellipses, 1997. 96 p.́

Iser W. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1994. 358 p.

Lejeune Ph. Je est un autre: l’autobiographie, de la littérature aux médias. Paris: Seuil, 1980. 333 p.

Lejeune Ph. Le pacte autobiographique. Paris: Seuil, 1975. 381 p.

McGill R. The treacherous imagination: intimacy, ethics and autobiographical fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2013. 208 p.

Miralaei А. A. S., Shokrian M. J. Le Je(u) autobiographique à travers la trilogie familiale de Duras // Recherches en langue et littérature françaises. Vol. 52, № 213. 2009. P. 67–80.

Soler Pérez A. «L’Amant» de Marguerite Duras ou l’image d’un univers aliénant // Estudios de lengua y literatura francesas. № 6. 1992. P. 107–128.

Van de Biezenbos L. Fantasmes maternelles dans l’oeuvre de Marguerite Duras: dialogue entre Duras et Freud. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. 214 p.

Viollet C. Autobiographie et disparition du «je»: Kindheitsmuster de Christa Wolf // Leçons d’écriture, ce que disent les manuscrits. Paris, Minard, 1985. P. 195– 206.

How to Cite

Шуринова, Н. С. (2018). Narration Features in the Novel “The Lover” by M. Duras. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (1), 31–37. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1112

Issue

Section

LITERATURE STUDY