Problems Language Personality Portrait Development of the Epic Writer (on the Example of A.I. Solzhenitsyn)
Abstract
Elena Yu. Tretyakova (Krasnodar, Russian Federation)
The article suggests that the study of individualized elements of style cannot exhaust the peculiarities of the creative style of such writers as A.I. Solzhenitsyn. Using the example of the literary-critical works of J. Niva and a number of scientific studies, it is shown that these, recognized as authoritative, interpretations do not take into account Solzhenitsyn’s epic dominant of creativity: the positivist toolkit does not contribute, but prevents the inclusion and understanding of the mechanisms of non-individualistic processing of the meaning in the language. In expressing his creative credo, A. I. Solzhenitsyn repeatedly emphasized his desire to be a Christian writer. Defending a commitment to culture-faith, he entered into irreconcilable conflict with the positivist dogma. His inherent non-individualistic sense of language was manifested both in “Little Hearts” and in epic works, in the “Russian Dictionary of Language Expansion”, and in the records about the works of favorite authors (“Literary Collection”) imbued with the desire to be extremely honest before their native culture. The author of the article proposes to intensify the development of philological tools, which make it possible to reveal the dominants of the linguistic personality of epic writers, which are directly caused by the nature of natural languages. The source of this methodology is in the writings of XIX century Russian Humboldtans. (I. V. Kireevsky, A. A. Potebnya, and others), whose linguophilosophical ideas and research methods can be reintroduced into scientific use and applied to explain epic phenomena.
Key words: A.I. Solzhenitsyn, the writer’s linguistic personality, epic artistic consciousness, national language, nationality, culture-faith, Russian Humboldtism.
DOI 10.23683/1995-0640-2019-3-61-68References
Голубков М. М., Жуйкова Е. В. В пространстве прозы А. И. Солженицына: общие художественные принципы // Филол. регионалистика. 2013. № 2 (10) С. 7 – 12.
Злобин А. А. Ключевые концепты языковой картины мира А. И. Солженицына: особенности лексической и текстовой репрезентации // Вестн. Рязанск. гос. ун-та им. С. А. Есенина. 2018. № 4 (61) С. 154–163.
Караулов Ю. Н., Красильникова Е. В. Русская языковая личность и задачи ее изучения // Язык и личность. М.: Наука, 1989. С. 3 – 11.
Малыгина И. Ю. «Русский словарь языкового расширения» А. И. Солженицына как форма «диалога» с русскими писателями ХХ в. (А. Солженицын, Е. Замятин, И. Шмелев) // Филол. науки: Вопр. теории и практики. Вып. 1. Ч. 2. Тамбов: Грамота, 2016. C. 34–39.
Нива Ж. Александр Солженицын: Борец и писатель. СПб.: Вита Нова, 2014. 336 с.
Нива Ж. Поэтика Солженицына между «большими» и «малыми» формами // Звезда. 2003. № 12. С. 143–148.
Радченко О. А. Язык как миросозидание. Лингвофилософская концепция неогумбольдтианства. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2005. 312 с.
Солженицын А. И. Окунаясь в Чехова // Новый мир. 1988. № 10. С. 161 – 182.
Солженицын А. И. Темплтоновская лекция [Электронный ресурс] // URL: http://www.solzhenitsyn.ru/proizvedeniya/publizistika/stati_i_rechi/v_izgnanii/ templtonovskaya_lekziya.pdf (дата обращения: 30.11.2018).
Третьякова Е. Ю. Русская филологическая школа и проблемы печати // Культурная жизнь Юга России. 2003. № 4. С. 12 – 15.
Третьякова Е. Ю. Стиль и слог речи: индивидуальное, персональное и личностное начало языковой деятельности // Формирование науч.-метод. основ учеб. процесса по спец. «Книгораспространение». Вып. 3. Краснодар, 2010. С. 12–21.
References
Golubkov M. M., Zhuykova E. V. V prostranstve prozy A. I. Solzhenitsyna: obshchiye khudozhestvennyye printsipy. Filol. Regionalistika, 2013, no. 2 (10), pp. 7-12. (In Russian).
Zlobin A. A. Klyuchevyye kontsepty yazykovoy kartiny mira A. I. Solzhenitsyna: osobennosti leksicheskoy i tekstovoy reprezentatsii. Vestn. Ryazansk. gos. un-ta im. S. A. Esenina, 2018, no. 4 (61), pp. 154-163. (In Russian).
Karaulov Yu. N., Krasil’nikova E. V. Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost’ i zadachi yeyo izucheniya. Yazyk i lichnost’. M., Nauka, 1989. Pp. 3-11. (In Russian).
Malygina I. Yu. «Russkiy slovar’ yazykovogo rasshireniya» A. I. Solzhenitsyna kak forma «dialoga» s russkimi pisatelyami XX v. (A. Solzhenitsyn, E. Zamyatin, I. Shmelev). Filol. nauki: Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Vyp. 1. Ch. 2. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. Pp. 34-39. (In Russian).
Niva Zh. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: Borets i pisatel’. SPb., 2014. 336 p. (In Russian).
Niva Zh. Poehtika Solzhenitsyna mezhdu «bol’shimi» i «malymi» formami. Zvezda, 2003, no. 12, pp. 143-148. (In Russian).
Radchenko O. A. Yazyk kak mirosozidaniye. Lingvofilosofskaya kontseptsiya neogumbol’dtianstva. M., 2005. 312 p. (In Russian).
Solzhenitsyn A. I. Okunayas’ v Chekhova. Novyy mir, 1988, no. 10, pp. 161-182. (In Russian).
Solzhenitsyn A. I. Templtonovskaya lektsiya [Elektronnyy resurs]. Available at: http://www.solzhenitsyn.ru/proizvedeniya/publizistika/stati_i_rechi/v_izgnanii/ templtonovskaya_lekziya.pdf (accessed 30.11.2018). (In Russian).
Tret’yakova E. Yu. Russkaya filologicheskaya shkola i problemy pechati. Kul’turnaya zhizn’ Yuga Rossii, 2003, no. 4, pp. 12-15. (In Russian).
Tret’yakova E. Yu. Stil’ i slog rechi: individual’noye, personal’noye i lichnostnoye nachalo yazykovoy deyatel’nosti. Formirovaniye nauch.-metod. osnov ucheb. protsessa po spets. «Knigorasprostraneniye». Vyp. 3. Krasnodar, 2010. Pp. 12-21. (In Russian).
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
