Mikhail Sholokhov in the Creative Consciousness of Modern Russian Writers
Abstract
The views of modern Russian writers D. Bykov, A. Melikhov, Z. Prilepin on the personality and work of M. Sholokhov are presented. The features of their reading of the writer’s works are considered, the diversity and inconsistency of assessments and opinions are emphasized. Particular attention is paid to the attitude of modern writers to the problem of authorship of the novel «And Quiet the Don Flows». The analysis showed that all of the above authors emphasize the connection of the novel-epic M. Sholokhov with previous and subsequent works of the writer. But, if A. Melikhov and Z. Prilepin completely deny the fact of plagiarism, D. Bykov admits the fact of partial borrowing.
Key words: M. Sholokhov, D. Bykov, A. Melikhov, Z. Prilepin, «And Quiet the Don Flows», “Virgin Soil Upturned», image of the writer, problem of authorship.
DOI 10.18522/1995-0640-2020-1-21-26
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
