HEDGING AS a POLITENESS STRATEGY IN RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEWS

Authors

  • Olga A. Boginskaya Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Abstract

DOI 10.18522/1995-0640-2023-4-22-33

Metadiscourse in academic communication has been under the analysis of a great number of studies. However, most research was predominantly conducted on English academic texts, while metadiscourse strategies are used in Russian-language academic prose remains understudied and needs to be explored. On the basis of 50 reviews of manuscripts submitted to Russian journals, the present article analyzes types of the lexical realization of hedging as a metadiscourse strategy used by reviewers to mitigate negative evaluations and to show politeness. The study is relevant due to the numerous attempts to reconceptualize the nature of academic discourse and to ascribe it to the interactional rather than informational type of communication. Hedging is used for constructing harmonious relationship between the reviewer and the reviewee. The present study aims to identify lexical items used for hedging in the corpus of research article reviews. When the quantitative analysis reveals that hedging is predominantly realized through the use of verbs and adverbs, the interpretive analysis shows that lexical hedges serve for three pragmatic functions such as shifting the communicative focus, mitigating criticism, and de-intensifying negative evaluations. Hedging is an indicator of the authorial pragmatic competence and is a key to effective communication in the evaluative genres of academic discourse and research articles reviews. It creates a proper balance of negative and positive evaluations, assists in saving face and constructing an image of a competent partner.

Keywords: academic discourse, scientific review, hedging, meta-discourse, negative assessment, lexical unit

Author Biography

Olga A. Boginskaya , Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Doctor of Philology, Ph.D. of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages, Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

How to Cite

Boginskaya , O. A. . (2023). HEDGING AS a POLITENESS STRATEGY IN RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEWS . Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, 27(4), 22–33. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1895

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 4 (2023)

Section

LINGUISTICS

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Olga A. Boginskaya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).