COMMUNICATIVE TACTICS OF THE PERSUASIVE STRATIGY IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE OF ENGLISH MONOGRAPHS

Authors

  • Дарья Алексеевна Копыл Южный федеральный университет

Abstract

Kopyl D.A.

Keywords: scientific discourse, communicative tactic, communicative strategy, persuasive, scientific genre, monograph, essay.

This paper is devoted to communicative tactics of the persuasive strategy which are used in the sphere of scientific discourse on the whole and in such scientific genres as a monograph and an essay in particular. Persuasive elements are based on the principles of argumentation, the study of which began at the times of Aristotle. The author analyses most frequent persuasive tactics in the scientific sphere. They are “reference to the authority”, “generalization of supporters of the viewpoint” and others.

Author Biography

Дарья Алексеевна Копыл, Южный федеральный университет

Аспирант кафедры теории и практики английского языка факультета лингвистики и словесно­сти Южного федерального университета

References

Барт Р. Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика. М.,1989.

Бергельсон М.Б. Принципы коммуникации, коммуникативные функции языка и фактор адресата // http://www.russcomm.ru/rca_biblio/b/bergelson- text27.doc.

Грайс Г.П. Логика и речевое общение // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 16: Лингвистическая практика. М., 1985.

Дубов Г.И. Убеждение // Психологический лексикон. Энциклопедический словарь: в 6 т. / ред.-сост. Л.А. Карпенко; под общ. ред. А.В. Петровского. М., 2006.

Зарецкая Е.Н. Убеждающая речь (Persuasive Speech) // http://www. dialog-21.ru/dialog2007/materials/html/3-0.htm.

Огурцов А.П. Научный дискурс: власть и коммуникация (дополнительность двух традиций) // Философские исследования. 1993. № 3.

Поварнин С. Спор: О теории и практике спора // Вопросы философии. 1990. № 2.

Рузавин Г.И. Методологические проблемы аргументации. М., 1997.

Таирова М.Р. Семантико-синтаксические особенности оценки как манипулятивного средства (на материале современного английского языка): дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Ростов н/Д., 2011.

Федосюк М.Ю. Выявление приемов «демагогической риторики» как компонента полемического искусства // Риторика в развитии человека и общества. Пермь, 1992.

Arnold C.C., BowersJ.W. Handbook of Rhetorical and Communication. Allyn and Bacon. Inc. Boston, 1984.

Guerin W.L., Earle G.L., Morgan L. A. Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Oxford, 2004.

Krever V., Zazanashvili N, Jungius H., Williams L., Petelin D. Executive sum¬mary // Biodiversity of the Caucasus Ecoregion: an analysis of biodiversity and current threats and initial investment portfolio. M., 2001.

Nightingale A. Mimesis: ancient Greek literary theory // Literary Theory and Criticism. Oxford, 2006.

Waugh P. Foreword // Literary Theory and Criticism. Oxford, 2005.

Waugh P. Introduction: criticism, theory, and anti-theory // Literary Theory and Criticism. Oxford, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-30

How to Cite

Копыл, Д. А. (2012). COMMUNICATIVE TACTICS OF THE PERSUASIVE STRATIGY IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE OF ENGLISH MONOGRAPHS. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (4), 157–165. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/459

Issue

No. 4 (2012)

Section

LINGUISTICS

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).