SOME FEATURES OF AGREEMENT/DISAGREEMENT EXPRES¬SION IN SCIENTIFIC STYLE
Abstract
Makitova T. T.
Keywords: scientific style, evaluative, agreement/disagreement, communicative function.
The article is devoted to the study of some specific features of agreement/disagreement expressions in scientific style (on the material of monographs in the Humanities). The choice and organization of linguistic means of agreement/disagreement expression in different functional styles are not identical. They are defined by the communication situation and aims of communication. The article focuses on revealing peculiar features in expressing of agreement/disagreement conditioned by the factors mentioned above.
References
Аликаев Р. С. Язык науки в парадигме современной лингвистики. Нальчик, 1999.
Будагов Р. А. Сходства и несходства между родственными языками. М., 1985.
Данилевская Н. В. Функция оценки в процессе формирования нового знания // Язык. Текст. Дискурс. Научный альманах. Вып.8. Ставрополь, 2010.
Зверева Е. А. Научная речь и модальность. М., 1983.
Троянская Е. С. Некоторые особенности выражения отрицательной оценки в жанре научной рецензии (к вопросу о некатегоричности высказывания в научном стиле) // Язык и стиль научного изложения (лингвометодические исследования). М., 1983.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).