COMMUNICATIVE-PARADIGMATIC AND PRAGMALINGUISTIC ASPECT OF OPPOSITIONAL SUBSTITUTION IN SYNTAX
Abstract
Key words: oppositional substitution, opposition, paradigmatic syntax, communicative types of sentences, speech act, pragmatic polysemy, pragmatic transposition.
The article deals with the phenomenon of oppositional substitution in morphology and syntax. The author describes two types of oppositional substitution in the sphere of syntax: pragmatic polysemy (neutralization) and functional-semantic transposition. Neutralization takes place when the grammatical form, which is used, loses its own functional meaning and acquires the meaning of its counter-member; in other words, it becomes functionally equivalent with its oppositional counter-member. This type of oppositional reduction is stylistically indifferent (neutral). Transposition takes place in cases where one member of the opposition preserves to a certain extent its original functional meaning alongside the meaning of its counterpart; the two functional meanings are actually combined. This type of oppositional reduction is stylistically marked. Oppositional substitution both in morphology, and in syntax is a manifestation of asymmetric dualism of a language sign.
Petina Svetlana Sergeevna - post-graduate student of theory and practice of the English language dpt.
References
Бадайцева В.В. Синкретизм // Лингв. энцикл. словарь. М., 1990.
Блох М.Я. Категория оппозиционного замещения // Вопросы теории англ. яз. М., 1973.
Блох М.Я. Проблемы парадигматического синтаксиса: дис.. д-ра филол. наук. М., 1976.
Блох М.Я. Теоретические основы грамматики. М., 2000.
Блох М.Я., Данчеева Н.В. Стилистический аспект грамматической формы (к проблеме оппозиционного замещения) // Филол. науки. 1983. № 3.
Боева Н.Б. Краткий толковый словарь социолингвистических терминов. М., 2004
Боева-Омелечко (Боева) Н.Б. О разграничении понятий прагматической многозначности и прагматического транспонирования // Коммуникативная парадигма в гуманит. науках: материалы XI науч.-практ. конф. Ростов н/Д., 2007.
Гак В.Г. Транспозиция // Лингв. энцикл. словарь М., 1990.
Журавлёв В.К. Нейтрализация // Лингв. энцикл. словарь. М., 1990. Иванова И.П., Бурлакова В.В., Почепцов Г.Г. Теоретическая грамматика современного английского языка. М., 1981.
Падучева Е.В. Семантические исследования (Семантика времени и нарратива). М., 1996.
Почепцов О.Г. Основы прагматического описания предложения. Киев, 1986.
Ширяев E.H. Семантико-синтаксическая структура разговорного диалога // Рус. яз. в науч. освещении. 2001. № 1.
Sadock J. Towards Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York, 1974.
Searle J.R. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Сambridge, 1969.
Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, 1986.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
