Intention as an object of interdisciplinary study
Abstract
This article discusses the intent, which is a fundamental element in the process of speech production and, in general, defines the purpose of the statements, as well as response. In most scientific disciplines intention has been investigated in the framework of such concepts as “intention.” It motivates dialogue, it gives meaning and value. The article highlights the main approaches to the concept of “intention”: philosophical, social, psychological. Within the framework of these approaches it is used the features of the functioning of intentions with the main specific characteristics of this concept, namely: 1) intention, 2) determination, 3) intentionality, 4) goal setting, 5) modality, 6) communicative failure, 7) manipulation, 8) rational choice. In philosophy, the term “intention” is seen as an intention, purpose, direction. In psychology, the term becomes a feature of the subjectivity of intentional behavior. It is also noted that the intention of understanding the psychological approach refers us to the concept of “intention”, the article highlighted two types of modality and the disclosure of their identity. In the field of social sciences study the term is inextricably linked with the concept as a rational choice, which in turn contributes to the selection of the strategies and tactics of behavior of the speaker in the communication process. The paper also is identified and analyzed as part of the concept in the speech interaction and types of speech influence.
Keywords: intention, modality, subjective, interpersonal interaction, communication failure, manipulation, rational choice, the voice of strategy and tactics.
Ekizyan Anait Khachaturovna - post-graduate student of theory and practice of the English language dpt. Institute of philology, journalism and cross-cultural communication, Southern federal university. Phone: +7 952588-81-89; е-mail: 1991.200@rambler.ru
References
Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов: 2-е изд., стереотипное. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1969.
Винокур Т.Г. К характеристике говорящего. Интенция и реакция // Язык и личность. М.: Наука, 1989.
Джери Д., Джери Д. Большой толковый социологический словарь. Т. 1. М.: Вече-АСТ, 2009.
Желтухина М.Р. Специфика речевого воздействия тропов в языке СМИ: автореф. дис.... д-ра филол. наук. М., 2004.
Иссерс О.С. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики русской речи. М., 2002.
Леонтьев А.О. Психологические особенности лектора. М., 1981.
Лисоченко Л.В. Убеждение как назначение судебной речи в дидактическом и методическом освещении // Личность, речь и юридическая практика. Вып. 6. Ростов н/Д., 2003.
Матвеева Т.В. Полный словарь лингвистических терминов. Ростов н/Д.: Феникс, 2010.
Мещеряков Б., Зинченко В. Большой психологический словарь. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2002.
Новейший философский словарь / сост. А.А. Грицанов. Минск: Изд-во В.М. Скакун, 1998.
Серль Дж. Косвенные речевые акты // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVII: Теория речевых актов. М., 1986.
Смит Н. Современные системы психологии: пер. с англ. / под ред.
A. А. Алексеева. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2003. (Серия «Психологическая энциклопедия»).
Сытник Л.И., Кривуля В.А. О скрытом прагматическом воздействии в научно-техническом тексте // Прагматика и типология коммуникативных единиц языка. Днепропетровск, 1989.
Тарасов Е.Ф. Речевое воздействие: методология и теория // Оптимизация речевого воздействия. М., 1990.
Ферс Дж. Р. Техника семантики // Новое в лингвистике. Вып. 2 / под ред. C.А. Звегинцева. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит., 1962.
Философский энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред.: Л.Ф. Ильичев, П.Н. Федосеев, С.М. Ковалев, В.Г. Панов. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1983.
Шмелева Т.В. Речевой жанр: возможность описания и использования в преподавании языка // Русистика (Берлин), 1990. № 2.
Fuchs S. Agency and Intention. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009.
Giorgi A. Phenomenology and the Foundations of Psychology // Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 23. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1975.
Rychlak J.E. The multiple meanings of “dialectic” // Contributions to Human Development. Edited by J.E. Rychlak. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976.
Rychlak J.E. The Psychology of Rigorous Humanism, sec. ed. New York Universities, 1988.
Skinner B.E. Science and Human Behavior. N. Y.: Macmillan 1953.
Skinner B.E. About Behaviorism. N. Y.: Knopf, 1974.
References
Akhmanova O.S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov: 2-e izd., stereotipnoe. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1969.
Vinokur T.G. K kharakteristike govoryashchego. Intentsiya i reaktsiya // Yazyk i lichnost’. M.: Nauka, 1989.
Dzheri D., Dzheri D. Bol'shoi tolkovyi sotsiologicheskii slovar'. Tom I. Moskva: Veche-AST, 2009.
Zheltukhina M.R. Spetsifika rechevogo vozdeistviya tropov v yazyke SMI: аvtoref. dis.... d-ra filol. nauk. M., 2004.
Issers O.S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi. M., 2002. Leont'ev A.O. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti lektora. M., 1981.
Lisochenko L.V. Ubezhdenie kak naznachenie sudebnoi rechi v didakticheskom i metodicheskom osveshchenii // Lichnost', rech' i yuridicheskaya praktika. Vyp. 6. Rostov-na-Donu, 2003.
Matveeva T.V. Polnyi slovar' lingvisticheskikh terminov. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2010.
Meshcheryakov B., Zinchenko V. Bol'shoi psikhologicheskii slovar'. SPb.: Praim-Evroznak, 2002.
Noveishii filosofskii slovar' / sost. A.A. Gritsanov. Minsk.: Izd-vo V.M. Skakun, 1998.
Serl' Dzh. Kosvennye rechevye akty // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. XVII: Teoriya rechevykh aktov. M., 1986.
Smit N. Sovremennye sistemy psikhologii? per. s angl. / pod red. A.A. Alekseeva. SPb.: Praim-Evroznak, 2003. (Seriya «Psikhologicheskaya entsiklopediya»).
Sytnik L.I., Krivulya V.A. O skrytom pragmaticheskom vozdeistvii v nauchno- tekhnicheskom tekste // Pragmatika i tipologiya kommunikativnykh edinits yazyka. Dnepropetrovsk, 1989.
Tarasov E.F. Rechevoe vozdeistvie: metodologiya i teoriya // Optimizatsiya rechevogo vozdeistviya. M., 1990.
Fers Dzh. R. Tekhnika semantiki // Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. 2 / pod red. I.A. Zvegintseva. M.: Izd-vo inostr. literatury. 1962.
Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red.: L.F. Il'ichev, P.N. Fedoseev, S.M. Kovalev, V.G. Panov. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1983.
Shmeleva T.V. Rechevoi zhanr: vozmozhnost' opisaniya i ispol'zovaniya v prepodavanii yazyka // Rusistika (Berlin), 1990. № 2.
Fuchs S. Agency and Intention. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009.
Giorgi A. Phenomenology and the Foundations of Psychology // Neraska Symposium on Motivation, vol.23. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1975.
Rychlak J.E. The multiple meanings of “dialectic” // Contributions to Human Development. Edited by J.E. Rychlak. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976.
Rychlak J.E. The Psychology of Rigorous Humanism, sec. ed. New York Universities, 1988.
Skinner B.E. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953. Skinner B.E. About Behaviorism. New York: Knopf, 1974.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).