Grammatical norm problem in diachronies (on the material of the manuscript of the XVII century “Jesus Christ passions”)
Abstract
Serebryakova Elina Valerievna
The article describes the results of the study in terms of the implementation of the grammatical rules of the text of the apocryphal writings of «Jesus Christ Passion», forming the bulk of convolutes of the XVII century, which is stored in the Mordovian regional museum and has not been introduced in the scientific sphere. It is given the definition of the grammatical norm, summarized the point of view of well-known scientists who study the evolution of the norms of book-Slavic language at different stages of its development and in the establishment and description of the main characteristics of the «strict» and reduced norm of the Church Slavonic language. It is use/disuse of a complicated system of past tenses of verbs, the dual number, principles in the use of participle forms, formation of imperative, causal, conditional and temporary relations and other features. An analysis of the graphic-orthographic and grammatical features of the manuscript concluded that the language of the monument is in the center of the Church Slavonic language of the reduced standard of the XVII century with the appearance of dialectal features inherent to the southern Russian dialects.
Key words: apocryphal manuscript, macrotext, linguistic norm, past forms, dual number, construction dative independent.
References
Алексеев А. А. Пути стабилизации языковой нормы в России XI-XVI вв. // Вопросы языкознания. 1987. № 2.
Виноградов В. В. История русского литературного языка. Избранные труды. М., 1978.
Горшков А. И. Теория и история русского литературного языка. М., 1987. Дёмкина Э. В., Акимова Э. Н. Проблемы перевода в электронный ресурс лицевого рукописного сборника XVII века // Информационные технологии и письменное наследие. Петрозаводск ; Ижевск, 2012.
Ремнёва М. Л. Пути развития русского литературного языка XI-XVII вв. М., 2003.
Толстой Н. И. История и структура славянских литературных языков. М., 1988.
Успенский Б. А. История русского литературного языка (XI-XVII вв.): 3-е изд., испр. и доп. М., 2002.
Хабургаев Г. А. Возможности построения «синтетической» истории русского языка (в связи с замечаниями А. В. Исаченко) // Вопросы филологии. М., 1969.
References
Alekseev A. A. Puti stabilizatsii yazykovoi normy v Rossii XI-XVI vv. // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1987. № 2.
Vinogradov V. V. Istoriya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1978.
Gorshkov A. I. Teoriya i istoriya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. M., 1987.
Demkina E. V., Akimova E. N. Problemy perevoda v elektronnyi resurs litsevogo rukopisnogo sbornika XVII veka // Informatsionnye tekhnologii i pis'mennoe nasledie. Petrozavodsk; Izhevsk, 2012.
Remneva M. L. Puti razvitiya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XI-XVII vv. M., 2003.
Tolstoi N. I. Istoriya i struktura slavyanskikh literaturnykh yazykov. M., 1988.
Uspenskii B. A. Istoriya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka (XI-XVII vv.). 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M., 2002.
Khaburgaev G. A. Vozmozhnosti postroeniya «sinteticheskoi» istorii russkogo yazyka (v svyazi s zamechaniyami A. V. Isachenko) // Voprosy filologii. M., 1969.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).