Discourive boundaries of the «Alien» within the space of literature and narration communication
Abstract
Detinko Yulia Ivanovna, Mikalauskaite Elizaveta Yuliponasovna
The article considers the opposition «own/alien» in the framework of cross-cultural communication. The material of the study is a German- language novel «Die undankbare Fremde», created by writer Brezhnev, who survived the experience of migration to a foreign country and adapting to a new culture. The narrator in the novel describes his and other people’s space by means of mental and speech behaviour lines - discursive boundaries. The role of boundaries between the two cultures is the language level, the attitude to time and space. The difference in cultural and linguistic features, described in the novel, is confirmed by the theory of cultural parameters by E.T. Holl. This intersection can be carried out both at the level of the external social behavior, and on a deeper level - inner emotional «I» narrator describes the discursive boundaries using antonymous vocabulary, metaphors, pronoun deixis.
Key words: literary and narrative communication, foreignness, “own/ alien”, discursive boundary.
References
Брежна И. Неблагодарная чужестранка. М.: Эксмо, 2014.
Вальденфельс Б. Своя культура и чужая культура. Парадокс науки о чужом // Логос. М., 1995. № 6.
Выготский Л.С. Мышление и речь // Соч. Т. 2. М.: Педагогика, 1982.
Диспозиция «свой - чужой» в культуре: монография / под. ред. А.С. Кравца (ответственный редактор), В.Т. Титова, Е.Н. Ищенко, Л.И. Гришаевой. Воронеж: Издательско-полиграфический центр Воронежского государственного университета, 2007.
Захарова Е.П. Коммуникативная категория чуждости и ее роль в организации речевого общения // Вопросы стилистики: межвуз. сб. науч. тр. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 1998.
Колосов С.А. Конструирование социальной ненависти в дискурсе: автореф. дис. . канд. филол. наук. Тверь, 2004.
Куликова Л.В. Межкультурная коммуникация: теоретические и прикладные аспекты. На материале русской и немецкой лингвокультур: монография. Красноярск: РИО КгПу, 2004.
Леонтович О.А. Русские и американцы: парадоксы межкультурного общения. М.: Гнозис, 2005.
Лотман Ю.М. «Изгой» и «изгойничество» как социально-психологическая позиция в русской культуре преимущественно допетровского периода («свое» и «чужое» в истории русской культуры) // Учен. записки / Тарт. гос. ун-т. Тарту, 1982. Вып. 576.
Уфимцева Н.В. Русские - свои или чужие: взгляд европейцев // Бытие в языке: сб. науч. тр. к 80-летию В.И. Жельвиса / под науч. ред. д-ра филол. наук, проф. Т.Г. Кучиной. Ярославль: Изд-во ЯГПУ, 2011.
Шипилов А.В. «Свои», «чужие» и другие. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2008.
Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом / пер. с нем. и англ. М.: «Российская политическая энциклопедия», 2004.
Bausinger H. Das Bild der Fremde in der alltagskultur // Universitas 43, 2, H. 9. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft,1988.
Bootzin R.R. Psychology today: An inrtoduction / R.R. Bootzin, G.H. Bower, J. Crocker, E. Hall. Seventh edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.
Brezna I. Die undankabare Fremde. Berlin: Verlag Galiani, 2012.
Chilton P. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge, 2004.
Chilton P., Schaffner C. Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse // Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse / ed. by P. Chilton, C. Schaffner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2002.
Galasin’ska A., Galasin’ski D. Discursive strategies for coping with sensitive topics of the Other // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2003.
Gudykunst W.B. Bridging differences: effective intergroup communication. Third edition. London: Sage publications Ltd, 1998.
HallE.T. The hidden dimension. London: Anchor Books Doubleday, 1990.
Maaz H.-J. Der Gefühlsstau. Ein Psychogramm der DDR. Berlin: Argon, 1990.
Riggins S.H. The research of othering // The language and politics of exclusion: others in discourse / ed. by S.H. Riggins. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1997. P. 1-30.
References
Brezhna I. Neblagodarnaya chuzhestranka. M.: Eksmo, 2014.192 s.
Dispozitsiya «svoi - chuzhoi» v kul’ture: monografiya / pod. red. A.S. Kravtsa (otvetstvennyi redaktor), V.T. Titova, E.N. Ishchenko, L.I. Grishaevoi. Voronezh: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskii tsentr Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta, 2007. 257 s.
Val’denfel’s B. Svoya kul’tura i chuzhaya kul’tura. Paradoks nauki o chuzhom // Logos. M., 1995. № 6. S. 77 - 94.
Vygotskii L.S. Myshlenie i rech’. Soch. T. 2. Pedagogika. M., 1982. 504 s.
Kolosov S.A. Konstruirovanie sotsial’noi nenavisti v diskurse: avtoref. dis. . kand. filol. nauk. Tver’, 2004. 18 s.
Kulikova L.V. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty. Na materiale russkoi i nemetskoi lingvokul’tur: monografiya. Krasnoyarsk: RIO KGPU, 2004. 196 s.
Leontovich O.A. Russkie i amerikantsy: paradoksy mezhkul’turnogo obshcheniya. M.: Gnozis, 2005. 352 s.
Lotman Yu.M. «Izgoi» i «izgoinichestvo» kak sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya pozitsiya v russkoi kul’ture preimushchestvenno dopetrovskogo perioda («svoe» i «chuzhoe» v istorii russkoi kul’tury) // Uchenye zapiski. Tartu: Tart. gos. un-t, 1982. Vyp. 576. S. 110 - 121.
Ufimtseva N.V. Russkie - svoi ili chuzhie: vzglyad evropeitsev // Bytie v yazyke: sb. nauchn. trudov k 80-letiyu V.I. Zhel’visa / pod nauch. red. d-ra filol. nauk, prof. T.G. Kuchinoi. Yaroslavl’: izd-vo YaGPU, 2011. S. 234 - 238.
Shipilov A.V. «Svoi», «chuzhie» i drugie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 568 s.
Shyuts A. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom / per. s nem. i angl. M.: «Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya» (ROSSPEN), 2004. 1056 s.
Zakharova E.P. Kommunikativnaya kategoriya chuzhdosti i ee rol’ v organizatsii rechevogo obshcheniya // Voprosy stilistiki: Mezhvuz. sb. nauchn. tr. Saratov: izd- vo Sarat. un-ta, 1998. S. 87 - 94.
Bausinger H. Das Bild der Fremde in der alltagskultur // Universitas 43, 2, H. 9. 1988. S. 946. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart.
Bootzin R.R. Psychology today: An inrtoduction / R.R. Bootzin, G.H. Bower, J. Crocker, E. Hall. Seventh edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991. 728 p.
Brezna I. Die undankabare Fremde. Verlag Galiani Berlin, 2012. 140 S.
Chilton P. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge, 2004. 226 r.
Chilton P., Schaffner C. Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse // Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse / ed. by P. Chilton, C. Schaffner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2002. P. 1 - 41.
Galasin’ska A., Galasin’ski D. Discursive strategies for coping with sensitive topics of the Other // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2003. P. 849 - 863.
Gudykunst W.B. Bridging differences: effective intergroup communication. Third edition. London: Sage publications Ltd, 1998. 351 p.
Hall E.T. The hidden dimension. London: Anchor Books Doubleday, 1990. 217 p.
Maaz H.-J. Der Gefuhlsstau. Ein Psychogramm der DDR. Berlin: Argon, 1990. 243 S.
Riggins S.H. The research of othering // The language and politics of exclusion: others in discourse / ed. by S.H. Riggins. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1997. P. 1 - 30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
