The contrast of political modalization in American and Russian sociopolitical media discourses

Authors

  • Наталья Борисовна Боева-Омелечко Southern Federal University

Abstract

Natalya B. Boeva-Omelechko (Southern Federal University, Rostovon-Don, Russian Federation)

The article focuses on the phenomenon of political modalization as an immanent feature  of socio-political media discourse. Political modalization is not restricted to modality in the narrow, traditional sense and   presupposes ideological interpretation of facts and events described in texts of the discourse in question. This interpretation can be directly contrary in oppositional discourses. Due to it  contrast pictures of the world are created in the minds of recipients. Especially it concerns such modal objects as states.  The article reveals linguistic means used for creating two images of America which stand in opposition to each other in American and Russian socio-political media discourses. These means include  utterances with explicit evaluations (axiological means of  modalization), microcontexts where the name of America is regularly used with names of negatively or positively evaluated phenomena (syntagmatic associative means of modalization) and conceptual metaphors with  negative or positive connotations (metaphoric means of  modalization). In American socio-political discourse these means help to represent the USA as an exceptional superpower playing the vital role in the struggle for freedom, justice and peace. In contrast to it Russian sociopolitical discourse represents America as an aggressive country which seeks to dominate the world   through wars, threats, pressure on other countries. In this discourse America is associated with chaos, the unpredictability, avantyurizm, political deafness. It is concluded  that political modalization is a powerful means of influence  and effective means of its realization are worth studying.

Key words: socio-political media discourse, political modalization, contrast, America, axiological, syntagmatic associative, metaphoric means of modalization, conceptual metaphor.

DOI 10.23683/1995-0640-2017-2-178-186

Author Biography

Наталья Борисовна Боева-Омелечко, Southern Federal University

Natalya B. Boeva-Omelechko – Ph.D. of philology, professor. Institute of philology, journalism and cross-cultural communication, Southern Federal University. 

References

Боева-Омелечко Н.Б., Костенко Т.Ф., Володько В.Г. Контрастная репрезентация политических конфликтов в американском и российском президентских дискурсах // Изв. ЮФУ. Филол. науки. 2016. № 3. С. 61–68.

Водак Р. Язык. Дискурс. Политика. Волгоград: Перемена, 1997. 139 с.

Краснова Т.И. Другой голос. Анализ газетного дискурса русского зарубежья 1917–1920 (22) гг. СПб.: Северная звезда, 2011. 588 с.

Краснова Т.И. Модализация и интенциональность в аспекте анализа идеологического дискурса // Слово. Словарь. Словесность: материалы Всерос. науч. конф. СПб.: РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2012. С. 358–362.

Филичкина Т.П. Импликационные смыслы фразеологизмов в медиатекстах // Язык. Культура. Коммуникация: Материалы междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Орёл: Орловский гос. ун-т им. И.С.Тургенева, 2016. С. 310–314.

Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса: дис.… д-ра филол. наук. Волгоград, 2000. 440 с.

References

Boeva-Omelechko N.B., Kostenko T.F., Volod`ko V.G. Kontrastnaia reprezentatciia politicheskikh konfliktov v amerikanskom i rossii`skom prezidentskikh diskursakh. Izvestiia YuFU. Filol. nauki. 2016, no. 3, pp. 61–68. (In Russ.).

Vodak R. Iazy`k. Diskurs. Politika. Volgograd: Peremena, 1997. 139 p. (In Russ.).

Krasnova T.I. Drugoi` golos. Analiz gazetnogo diskursa russkogo zarubezh`ia 1917 – 1920 (22) gg. SPb.: Severnaia zvezda, 2011. 588 p. (In Russ.).

Krasnova T.I. Modalizatciia i intentcional`nost` v aspekte analiza ideologicheskogo diskursa. Slovo. Slovar`. Slovesnost`: Materialy. Vseros. nauch. konf. SPb.: RGPU im. A.I. Gercena, 2012, pp. 358 – 362. (In Russ.).

Filichkina T.P. Implikatcionny`e smy`sly` frazeologizmov v mediatekstakh. Iazy`k. Kul`tura. Kommunikatciia: Materialy. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Oryol: Orl. gos. un-t im. I.S.Turgeneva, 2016, no. 310–314. (In Russ.).

Shei`gal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa: dis.… d-ra filol. nauk. Volgograd, 2000. 440 p. (In Russ.).

Downloads

How to Cite

Боева-Омелечко, Н. Б. (2017). The contrast of political modalization in American and Russian sociopolitical media discourses. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (2), 178–186. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1030

Issue

No. 2 (2017)

Section

LINGUISTICS

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)