Reader as a Character’s Interlocutor in J. Barnes’ Postmodernist Texts
Abstract
Anastasia A. Borovkova (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
The texts of both novels are characterized by a notable lack of the narrator figure, which would have acted as an intermediary between the narrative and the readers, the imagined text world and the real world actors who perceive these works of art. In fact, both texts resemble the play script, which reveals a direct dialogue on several levels at once-between imaginary characters and the implied readers, the characters themselves and the fictional world of novel texts, the author and the real reader. The absence of an intermediary narrator in a literary – especially postmodern – work is not an innovation. J. Barnes eliminates the possibility of any system of ideas «behind the stage» voice, the author’s interpretation of the text. The basic organizational unit of the texts analyzed by us is not so much the chapter, as a kind of initial replica, consisting of a narrative character at some point unfolding the text storyline. The recipient of such remarks is the reader.
The imaginary world, which «blooms» in front of the reader’s eyes, is perceived as a primordial one, which does not even suggest a non-viscous conductor. In the absence of the narrator the narrative world is multi-faceted objectified in the text of novels based on the dialogical relationships between the characters and their addressees. The reader begins to perceive itself as a full participant in the communication that takes place between characters. In the texts of the two novels everything shows dependence on the flowing dialogical processes – starting with the title of the first novel and ending with the factor that the characters live and act solely as the narrative voices. Although, at first glance, it may seem that the novel texts are designed with the sequences of matched inner monologues and the general narrative matrix is a dialogic, the sources of which are usually three characters.
Key words: reader, character, postmodernist fiction interpretation, narrative technique, communicative style, dialogic interaction.
DOI 10.23683/1995-0640-2018-3-33-40
References
Клеменова Е.Н., Кудряшов И.А. Герменевтический анализ текста: когнитивные основания // Междунар. журн. прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2013. № 7. С. 109–113.
Кудряшов И.А. Полифонизм как способ повествовательной организации постмодернистского текста // Иностранные языки: лингвистические и методические аспекты. Тверь: Тверской гос. ун-т, 2014. С. 175–182.
Barnes J. Talking It Over. L.: Picador, 1992. 162 p.
Barnes J. Love, Etc. L.: Picador, 2001. 250 p.
Guignery V. The Fiction of Julian Barnes. NY.: Pelgrave MacMillan, 2006. 240 p.
References
Klemenova E.N., Kudryashov I.A. Germenevticheskiy analiz teksta:
kognitivnyye osnovaniya. Mezhdunar. zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy, 2013, no. 7, pp. 109-113. (In Russian).
Kudryashov I.A. Polifonizm kak sposob povestvovatel’noy organizatsii postmodernistskogo teksta. Inostrannye yazyki: lingvisticheskiye i metodicheskiye aspekty. Tver’: Tverskoy gos. universitet, 2014, pp. 175-182. (In Russian).
Barnes J. Talking It Over. L.: Picador, 1992. 162 p.
Barnes J. Love, Etc. L.: Picador, 2001. 250 p.
Guignery V. The Fiction of Julian Barnes. N.Y.: Pelgrave MacMillan, 2006. 240 p.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).