PECULARITIES OF NOMINATION OF THE SEMANTIC FIELD “ILLEGITIMATE CHILD” IN YOUTH LITERATURE OF THE 1920s
Abstract
https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2026-3-66-79
The specific ways of designating illegitimate child are examined based on youth literature of the 1920s. As a result of this study, the predominance of indirect nominations of an illegitimate child over direct ones by 4.5 times; the impact of extralinguistic factors; the variety of means of representing this topic; the weakening of an integral semantic feature through the semantics of uncertainty and transfer from genus to species in the prevailing number of indirect designations (66 %, or 68 examples) was found. The use of the studied linguistic units is limited by the socio-historical context. The nominations of an illegitimate child in the Soviet youth literature of the 1920s act as one of the means of social identification.
Key words: indirect nomination, direct nomination, taboo, illegitimate child, Illegitimate, foreign cultural context, pre-revolutionary context
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ekaterina N. Polyakova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).















