LINGUISTIC MEANS OF INFLUENCE ON AUDIENCE IN LEGAL DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Марина Васильевна Ласкова Southern federal university
  • Марина Сергеевна Медведева Southern federal university

Abstract

From the view point of rhetorics speech understanding lies in its perception as a recipient of the voice and representation of characters that would like to convey its creator. Part of the audience of public oratory uttered in court - opponents or active participants in the meeting. One part of the audience has the right to respond to cues, the other part of it - just listeners or viewers listening dispute of interest, or on duty, if a judge. Thus we perceive the judiciary as two types of recipients of active-passive and passive. This kind of dialogue is a dialogue that separates the audience. Persuasive argument depends on the quality level of the audience. Thus it is the audience that is a factor in determining the level of techniques of persuasive argumentation. As the lawyer must justify the consistency of its position in court to argue his decision to justify the opinion in the scientific community, the legal discourse contains a high degree of reasoning.

Key words: legal discourse, precise vocabulary, law discourse, rhetorical argument, negative emotions, emotional reasoning, assessment and expressive adjectives, logical stress.

Author Biographies

Марина Васильевна Ласкова, Southern federal university

Laskova Marina Vasilievna - Ph.D. of linguistics, professor of translation/interpreting and information technologies in linguistics dpt. Institute of philology, journalism and cross-cultural communications, Southern federal university. E-mail: perevod.ros@rambler.ru

Марина Сергеевна Медведева, Southern federal university

Medvedeva Marina Sergeevna - post-graduate student. of translation/ interpreting and information technologies in linguistics dpt. Institute of philology, journalism and cross-cultural communications.

References

Арутюнова Н.Д. Язык и мир человека. М., 1999.

Апресян Ю.Д. Фундаментальная классификация предикатов. М., 2006.

Волков А.А. Курс русской Риторики [Электронный ресурс]. 2000. URL: http://www.klikovo.ru/db/book/msg. (дата обращения: 18.09.2014).

Ивакина Н.Н. Основы адвокатского красноречия. М., 2002.

Николаева Т.М. От звука к тексту. М., 2000.

Порубов Н.И. Риторика. Учебное пособие. М., 2001.

Сопер П. Основы искусства речи. М., 1995.

Defense Attorney Edward MacMahon Opening Statement, Zacarias Moussaoui Trial http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/FTRIALS/moussaoui/zmmacmahon. html. (Дата обращения: 01.10.2014).

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/02/06/beyond-absurd-about- witness-8-dee-dee-telephone-interview-trayvon-martin-family-attorney-benjamin- crump-i-did-not-ask-her-name-or-address/. (дата обращения: 10.09.2014)

References

Arutyunova N.D. Language and the world of man. M., 1999.

Apresjan Y.D. The fundamental classification of predicates. M. 2006,

Ivakin N.N. Fundamentals of speech advocates. M., 2002.

Nikolaeva T.M. From the sound of the text. M., 2000.

Porubov N.I. Rhetoric. Textbook. M. 2001.

Soper P. Fundamentals art speech. M., 1995.

Volkov A.A. Course of Russian rhetoric [electronic resource]. 2000 Mode of access: http://www.klikovo.ru/db/book/msg. (data obrashcheniya: 18.sent.2014).

How to Cite

Ласкова, М. В., & Медведева, М. С. (2014). LINGUISTIC MEANS OF INFLUENCE ON AUDIENCE IN LEGAL DISCOURSE. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, (4), 114–124. Retrieved from https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/757

Issue

Section

LINGUISTICS